PRESS RELEASE
27th February 2007
Malcolm Moss MP voices opposition to
Government’s “Sinister” Road Pricing Scheme
The Department for
Transport has conducted a feasibility study and
drawn up the blueprints for a road pricing
system that is said to cost £62bn to set up and
£8.6bn each year to run. Motorists could be
faced with a cost of up to £600 to fit the black
box for the ‘pay as you go’ road pricing system.
1.5 million people
signed an online petition against the policy
describing it as “sinister and wrong”. The
Government have said that there are no cost free
answers to the environmental and congestion
problems we face and have decided to press on
with the scheme despite the fierce opposition.
Malcolm Moss MP
says:
“This system is
socially unfair and severely regressive on the
poor and those of moderate means, especially
where the option of public transport is
unavailable or unsatisfactory like in North East
Cambridgeshire.
Tax valuations
should be proportionate to the means of various
individuals. A heavy road pricing system like
the one the Government proposes could
economically cripple many of my constituents who
rely on their cars as their primary means of
transportation over significant distances.”
The Department for
Transport has predicted that payment will be
handled by call centres and direct debit.
Additionally an enforcement agency would need to
be set up to deal with the 15% of motorists that
are predicted will require debt management and
the 3% of motorist where debt collectors would
be needed.
These plans merely
add to the fears of motoring and civil liberty
groups that Britain in moving closer and closer
to a big brother society. The Department for
Transport’s feasibility study predicted that
about 30 million cars on the nation’s roads
could be tracked under this road pricing scheme.
Malcolm Moss MP
says:
“A recent YouGov
poll showed that only 9.1% of voters would
support a road tax. The road pricing system is
yet another stealth tax being imposed by the
Government. Not only that but it is one that
will unfairly affect rural residents. Mr Blair
should abandon the road pricing scheme and
consider other options such as an urban charging
scheme similar to the London congestion charge
or a version of the one in place in Singapore.
Such a scheme will target those who cause the
congestion problem rather then encourage blanket
targeting of all citizens”