14 November 2005
MALCOLM MOSS SPEAKS OUT
AGAINST POLICE FORCE MERGER – AND 90 DAYS POLICE
DETENTION
MP
Malcolm Moss has warned that the proposed
amalgamation of police forces in the Eastern
Region will result in a faceless, centralised
police force out of touch with its local
community.
He said:
“This is the next step towards a ‘National
Police Force’ when Chief Constables will be
responsible to meddling Labour Home Secretaries,
not to their local communities. If people think
the police are unaccountable now, just wait for
the brave new world under Tony Blair’s vision of
a future police state.”
He spoke
out against three options proposed by the Home
Office, which he firmly believes will result in
police forces becoming more remote and distant
from the people they serve. It is proposed to
reduce the present 43 local forces down to 12.
The
three options being considered for the Eastern
Region are:
A
regional police force combining
Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Suffolk,
Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Essex;
A
strategic force combining Cambridgeshire,
Norfolk and Suffolk, and another merging
Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Essex;
A
strategic force combining Cambridgeshire,
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, while
Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex join together.
Mr Moss
said none of these options were what people
wanted and sounded the death knell for the
spirit of community policing.
“We
would end up with a faceless, centralised
‘superforce’ that did not understand, or
support, the concerns of local people,” he
warned.
“It will
mean getting further and further away from local
police and local decision making, while the Home
Office will be able to operate more control and
a tighter reign over its 12 Chief Constables.”
“Chief
constables will be appointed centrally, instead
of locally, and I feel this should remain an
integral part of our local democracy. Why isn’t
the Home Office concentrating on putting more
money into the police budgets so that we can
have more bobbies in the front line and a more
responsive crime-busting force? If you ask the
public, they say this is what they want,
especially with rising crime, particularly
anti-social behaviour, causing so much concern
today. A greater police presence will do much to
deter this – and restore public confidence.”
On
another burning police issue, Mr Moss voted
against the Government’s proposal to detain
suspected terrorists for up to 90 days without
charge because there was no conclusive evidence
placed before Parliament to support it (even the
Home Affairs Select Committee said so). Tony
Blair’s appeal for support fell of deaf ears.
Mr Moss
said: “People remembered his totally spurious
claims about weapons of mass destruction before
we went to war in Iraq and didn’t believe him
this time. It was both unprecedented and
unacceptable to wheel in Chief Constables to
lobby MP’s directly, but since their jobs are on
the line with the proposed reorganisation, it
was understandable that they acquiesced. Tony
Blair’s argument that 90 days were needed to
check a terrorist suspect’s computer did not
make sense. We should be employing the best IT
specialists we can find to do this encryption
and pay them accordingly. This is not just a
matter of the time available; it is also about
resources, but no mention of that.
“Those
constituents who were persuaded by the
scurrilous propaganda in the Sun newspaper
should ask themselves why Rupert Murdoch wants
to keep Tony Blair in power (nothing to do with
monopolising the broadcasting of national
sporting events of course); why, if it was so
important, did the Home Secretary say it wasn’t
‘crucial’; why the 90 days wouldn’t have made a
blind bit of difference to the tragic events of
the 7th July; why MI5 and MI6 had no
comments to make about these proposals; and why
Tony Blair still refuses to agree to
Conservative proposals to allow phone taps to be
used as admissible evidence, and to deport those
(along with their families) who preach against
our values and society? No one can accuse me of
being soft on crime or on terrorists, since I
have voted three times now for the return of the
death penalty; something Tony Blair has never
done.”
Malcolm
Moss voted to double the time a suspect can be
held from 14 to 28 days, in itself a quantum
leap.
“If,
after a time, experience suggests that this
limit should be increased, I would be more than
happy to extend it, but Parliament requires
conclusive evidence, not what a discredited
Prime Minister thinks will look good as a
headline in the Sun,” added Mr Moss.